Advertisement
Todd Gloria and Kevin McCarty

If state funding vanishes, California’s homelessness crisis will explode

A police car drives by an encampment of unhoused people
A San Diego homeless encampment. With HHAP grants, the city has been able to reduce its unhoused population.
(Kevin Carter / Getty Images)

As two former members of the California Legislature, we understand the complexities and tough fiscal choices that come with a tightly constrained budget. As mayors of two of California’s largest cities, and members of the state’s Big City Mayors coalition, we also know the devastating consequences of abandoning a statewide commitment to address the homelessness crisis — a crisis driven by decades of underinvestment and inadequate housing production.

Homelessness is by far the most pressing issue facing communities up and down California, and the money the state has invested through the Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention Grant Program, known as HHAP, has had an enormous impact on our ability to get unhoused people off our streets.

That’s why we’re concerned that the proposed state budget does not include another round of funding for the program. HHAP grants — which for California’s biggest cities, with the biggest homeless populations, run into the millions of dollars — are essential to meet the goal of reducing encampments and getting unsheltered Californians on a path to permanent housing. Simply put, without these grants the state’s homelessness problem will balloon.

Even setting aside for the moment the human costs, the economic case for housing people is painfully clear.

Thanks to HHAP, our two cities have seen significant reductions in homelessness. In January, San Diego’s point-in-time count showed a 14% drop compared with 2024. Sacramento, where the most recent count was last year, achieved a 29% drop over two years. Previous rounds of HHAP funding allowed us to develop innovative, locally tailored solutions, resulting in real progress for thousands of our most vulnerable residents. Since HHAP’s inception in 2019, California’s 13 largest cities have used the state funds to create 17,691 shelter beds, connect more than 152,000 people to shelter, build 2,295 permanent housing units and place 42,215 Californians into temporary or permanent housing solutions.

Advertisement

In Sacramento, HHAP resources support more than 1,300 units of emergency shelter and hundreds of permanent supportive housing units. San Diego has doubled its citywide shelter capacity, expanded street outreach teams and created new interventions, including its Safe Parking Program for people living in their cars.

We understand that addressing homelessness is costly, and yet leaving people on the streets is far more expensive. Our police officers and firefighters find themselves on the front lines of the crisis, and that drives up costs for taxpayers. Businesses and schools are left to pick up the tab, too.

A lawyer for a nonprofit group suing the city over homeless services said he had withdrawn subpoenas seeking the testimony of Bass and two City Council members.

We recognize the importance of accountability. Our backgrounds as former legislators have taught us the value of fiscal responsibility, transparency and showing results with public dollars. California’s big cities are committed to ensuring HHAP funds are spent wisely and effectively. Big City Mayors tracks and reports how HHAP dollars are used, and we welcome additional oversight to ensure every dollar achieves maximum impact.

The data prove that previous state investments are making a real difference. But the scale of the crisis demands sustained investment. We are at a critical juncture. As the Trump administration retreats from its responsibilities on homelessness, it’s more important than ever for California to lead.

The human cost of inaction is immense. Every day, we see the faces of those who are struggling — veterans, families, children and people with disabilities. And every day, we see what’s possible when someone is moved from the sidewalk into shelter and then into a home.

Cash assistance is a proven way to keep people from becoming homeless. The hard part is identifying those who need aid. A clinical trial is trying to find out.

We urge the Legislature to meet this moment by fully funding HHAP at $1 billion — with a state general fund of more than $225 billion to work with, that should be possible.

Advertisement

The challenge of homelessness is not insurmountable — but we cannot afford to go backward. With support, our cities can continue their work making homelessness in the Golden State rare, brief and non-recurring.

Todd Gloria is the mayor of San Diego and Kevin McCarty is the mayor of Sacramento. Both are former members of the California Legislature, and members of the 13-city California group Big City Mayors.

Insights

L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.

Viewpoint
This article generally aligns with a Center Left point of view. Learn more about this AI-generated analysis

Perspectives

The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.

Ideas expressed in the piece

  • The authors argue that California’s Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention Grant Program (HHAP) has been critical in reducing homelessness, citing examples like San Diego’s 14% drop in homelessness in 2024 and Sacramento’s 29% reduction over two years[provided article].
  • They emphasize that HHAP funding has enabled cities to create over 17,000 shelter beds, connect 152,000 people to shelter, and place 42,215 individuals into housing since 2019, highlighting localized solutions like San Diego’s Safe Parking Program[provided article].
  • The authors warn that defunding HHAP would exacerbate homelessness, stressing that police, firefighters, and taxpayers bear higher costs when unsheltered populations remain on streets[provided article].
  • They advocate for sustained $1 billion HHAP funding, arguing that California’s $225 billion general fund makes this feasible and necessary to maintain progress[provided article].

Different views on the topic

  • Critics point to federal data showing California’s homeless population grew by 3% in 2024, with over 187,000 people unhoused—the highest raw number nationwide—suggesting existing programs haven’t halted growth[1][4][5].
  • Despite state efforts, 66% of California’s homeless population remains unsheltered, the highest rate in the U.S., raising questions about shelter accessibility and long-term housing strategies[2].
  • Los Angeles saw a 35% surge in homelessness in 2025, indicating regional disparities in program effectiveness and potential gaps in addressing localized crises[3].
  • While California’s homelessness growth rate (3%) is lower than the national average (18%), opponents argue even modest increases signal systemic challenges, particularly as 22 states faced double-digit rises[4][5].

Advertisement
OSZAR »